MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792739467 · doi:10.1002/2017rs006474

Propagation Directions of High‐Frequency Waves in the Ionosphere

2018· article· en· W2792739467 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueRadio Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
FundersNatural Environment Research CouncilGovernment of Canada
KeywordsIonospherePhysicsDipoleRadio waveTransmitterHigh frequencyElectric fieldRadio propagationComputational physicsEarth–ionosphere waveguideElectromagnetic radiationIonospheric heaterWave propagationOpticsGeophysicsTelecommunicationsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The direction of propagation of electromagnetic waves in the ionosphere from ground‐based transmitters can be measured in the ionosphere by crossed dipoles in a single cold‐plasma mode. In the Enhanced Polar Output Probe (e‐POP), 6‐m dipoles on the Radio Receiver Instrument connect to a high input impedance and act therefore as voltage probes from which the electric field of incoming waves can be simply computed. When combined with cold‐magnetoplasma electric‐field theory, the relationship of voltages on the two orthogonal dipoles is used to deduce the direction of arrival of an incoming wave in three dimensions. The technique is illustrated by application to e‐POP/Radio Receiver Instrument observations of 6.2‐MHz waves transmitted by the European Incoherent Scatter HF facility in Tromsø, Norway.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.694
Threshold uncertainty score0.357

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it