MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792760440 · doi:10.2134/cftm2017.05.0039

Foliar and Granular Fertilizer Effects on Creeping Bentgrass and Soil Nutrient Levels

2018· article· en· W2792760440 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCrop Forage & Turfgrass Management · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicTurfgrass Adaptation and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLoamFertilizerAgronomyNutrientUreaAgrostis stoloniferaAgrostisEnvironmental scienceChemistrySoil waterBiologyPoaceaeSoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Core Ideas Foliar fertilizer treatments did not deplete soil nutrient levels after three years of applications. Combining foliar and granular fertilizers resulted in the best turfgrass quality. Biweekly application of foliar fertilizers resulted in higher turf quality than monthly granular fertilizer applications. Research was conducted to determine the effects of foliar and granular fertilizers on creeping bentgrass [ Agrostis stolonifera var. L. palustris (Huds.) Farw. ‘Penn A4’] quality and soil nutrient levels of two putting green rootzones. The hypothesis was foliar fertilizers would decrease soil nutrient levels and result in lower turfgrass quality over 3 yr compared to granular fertilizers. The fertilizer treatments were granular urea, methylene urea, and natural organic, foliar fertilizer at two rates, foliar‐granular combination, and an untreated control. The two rootzones were a United States Golf Association (USGA) guideline rootzone and a sandy clay loam (58% sand, 20.5% silt, and 21.5%) native soil. The urea, methylene urea, natural organic, and foliar‐granular treatments were applied at 0.5 lb N/1000 ft 2 /month from May through October. The foliar treatment was applied at two rates, 0.25 and 0.5 lb N/1000 ft 2 /month from May through October. Soil samples were collected from 2009 to 2011 and turfgrass quality was rated every 2 weeks. Turfgrass growing on native soil had consistently higher quality than turfgrass on the USGA rootzone and native soil had higher soil NO 3 –N, P, and K levels than the USGA rootzone. Neither the foliar, granular, or combination treatments decreased soil NO 3 –N, P, or K levels compared to initial soil test levels over 3 year of research. Every two weeks, applications of both the combination and foliar 2X treatments produced higher turfgrass quality than monthly methylene urea, urea, and organic treatments. Although the 0.25 lb N/1000 ft 2 /month foliar treatment had a lower N rate than all fertilizer treatments, it had acceptable quality throughout the research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.709
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it