MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2793199562 · doi:10.30521/jes.338575

An Experimental Fuzzy Inference System for Global Grid Electricity Peak Power Load Forecasting Third Core Module of First Console on G2P3S

2017· article· en· W2793199562 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Energy Systems · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGoddard Space Flight CenterNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsMean absolute percentage errorAdaptive neuro fuzzy inference systemPower (physics)Electric power systemStatisticsMeteorologyComputer scienceFuzzy logicMean squared errorSimulationMathematicsGeographyFuzzy control systemArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our World gives several symptoms of climate change. Devastating draughts increase (negative for World (-)), global mean temperature increase (-), lightning strikes increase (-), sea ice cover melt (-), tree mortality increase (-), and forest degradation increase (-) have been observed for decades. They are all negative measures for continuity of life. Diversity of species has been decreasing, so that life on Earth is dying. Only responsible specie for this situation is humankind. This study presents a small footstep to prevent this situation. Modeling of a 100% renewable power grid on World (Global Grid) is eminent. Annual peak power load (Gigawatt: GW, Kilowatt: kW) (peak demand or load) forecasting in power demand side is crucial for global grid modeling. This study presents an experimental fuzzy inference system for the third core module (100 years’ power demand forecasting) of the first console (long term prediction) of Global Grid Peak Power Prediction System (G2P3S). The inputs (world population, global annual temperature anomalies °C) and the output (annual peak power load demand of Global Grid in GW) are modeled with seven triangular fuzzy input membership functions and seven constant output membership functions. The constant Sugeno-Type fuzzy inference system is used in the current experimental model. The maximum absolute percentage error (MAP) is calculated as 45%, and the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) is found as 39% in this experimental study. The MAP and MAPE of the first core module model (Type 1) were 0,46 and 0,36. The MAP and MAPE of the second core module model (Interval Type 2) were 0,46 and 0,36. As a result, this study is a good start for the third core module of the first console on Global Grid Peak Power Prediction System research, development, demonstration, & deployment (RD3) project. This experimental study also warns humankind in this subject. Hopefully, the most polluting societies on our World such as China, United States, India, Russia, Japan, Germany, South Korea, and Canada take urgent actions to start to build the foundations of 100% renewable power global grid by organizing a global grid consortium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it