Distributed Student's t filtering algorithm for heavy‐tailed noises
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary In this paper, a distributed Student's t filtering algorithm to deal with heavy‐tailed noises is developed. In the traditional Kalman filter, the distribution of the signal is assumed. However, in reality, outliers in the signal are often encountered for which the assumption of Gaussian distribution is no longer valid. The Student's t distribution can describe noises in the presence of outliers. As a result, the weight on each data point within the filter adapts to the data quality so that the filter becomes insensitive to the outliers. We first derive the distributed filtering algorithm from the centralized Student's t filter, which is able to handle heavy‐tailed noises such as outliers and then analyze properties of the proposed method. It is shown that the proposed algorithm provides the same accuracy as the centralized Student's t filtering with no performance loss. Furthermore, the distributed Student's t filtering with feedback is developed, which is in accordance with centralized filtering, and the local error covariance is reduced as expected. Two numerical examples support the theoretical results and illustrate the validity of the proposed method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it