A behavioral and fMRI examination of the effect of rhythm on reading noun-verb homographs aloud
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
These experiments explored the connection between rhythm and reading by examining whether reading is affected by a rhythmic prime that was either congruent or incongruent with the syllabic stress of the target letterstring. Previous research has shown congruency effects but only in a between-item design, which leaves open the possibility of extraneous variables contributing to the effects. The present design used noun-verb homographs (conflict vs. conflict), and their corresponding pseudohomophones (konflikt vs. konflikt). The results demonstrated significant congruency effects, whereby RTs were faster when the prime was congruent with the syllabic stress. The fMRI experiment identified several brain regions that underlie the rhythm-priming effect, and particularly the putamen’s involvement given recent research suggesting its role in phonetic decoding. These experiments provide the strongest within-item/within-participant evidence to date that a rhythm prime has an effect on lexical and sublexical reading, and inform our understanding of how rhythm and reading interact.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it