MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2794352985 · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2018.2811707

A Cumulant-Tensor-Based Probabilistic Load Flow Method

2018· article· en· W2794352985 on OpenAlexaff
Pouya Amid, Curran Crawford

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Systems · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Reliability and Maintenance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProbabilistic logicReliability (semiconductor)Monte Carlo methodElectric power systemMathematical optimizationComputer scienceWind powerGridRandom variableReliability engineeringTensor (intrinsic definition)Power (physics)EngineeringMathematicsElectrical engineeringStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Probabilistic load flow analysis is an important part of grid design, optimization, and operation due to the uncertainties in the power network for both generation and demand, increasingly so for newly integrated technologies including wind power and plug-in vehicles. A reliable, fast, and robust mathematical method for such analyses is a key requirement to help support widespread integration of these new generation and load sources. Conventional deterministic Monte Carlo analyses, though simple in implementation, becomes too slow as networks become more complex. In this paper, a new cumulant-tensor based method is used to assess power flows. Probability distribution functions and reliability indices are generated as final outputs. Furthermore, general correlation between input random variables is included in the analysis. An illustrative 2-bus network is presented along 24-bus IEEE system as case studies, showing the capabilities and increased reliability of the method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power SystemsSame topicPower System Reliability and MaintenanceFrench-language works237,207