Box–Cox‐chord transformations for community composition data prior to beta diversity analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In studies of spatial or temporal beta diversity, community composition data, often containing many zeros, must be transformed in some way before they are analysed by multivariate methods of data analysis. Data are transformed to reduce the skewness of species distributions and make dissimilarities double‐zero asymmetrical. Criteria have recently been proposed to determine which dissimilarity functions (or the corresponding data transformations) can be used for beta diversity assessment. The chord transformation is often used as the preliminary transformation for frequency data. When the Euclidean distance is computed on chord‐transformed data, a chord dissimilarity matrix D is produced, which obeys the proposed criteria. The Hellinger transformation, i.e. the chord transformation applied to square‐root transformed frequencies, is also often used with community composition data prior to multivariate analyses; it leads to the Hellinger dissimilarity, which is another widely used D function in beta diversity studies. Among the data transformations often used in simple or multivariate data analysis, the Box–Cox method provides a useful series of transformations to make data distributions more symmetrical, where exponent 1 is the absence of a transformation, exponent 0.5 is the square‐root, exponent 0.25 is the fourth‐root, and the log transformation is the limit of the Box–Cox function corresponding to exponent 0. Combining the two previous ideas, this paper proposes to combine any transformation of the Box–Cox family with exponent in the [0,1] range with the chord transformation. In particular, one can compute the log e ( y + 1) transformation of a community composition (or other frequency) data table and follow with a chord transformation. A D matrix can be computed from the doubly‐transformed data. The transformations and D functions in that family inherit the properties of the chord dissimilarity, and this ensures that they all follow the necessary criteria for beta diversity assessment that have recently been proposed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.032 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".