Dominating Set Algorithms for Wireless Sensor Networks Survivability
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Limited energy of the sensors is one of the key issues towards realizing a reliable wireless sensor network (WSN), which can survive under the emerging WSN applications. A promising method for conserving the energy of these sensors can be implemented by applying a sleep-wake scheduling while distributing the data gathering and sensing tasks to a dominating set of awake sensors while the other nodes are in a sleep mode. Producing the maximum possible number of such disjoint dominating sets, called the domatic partition problem in unit disk graphs, can further prolong the network lifetime. This problem becomes challenging when the initial energy of the nodes varies from one to another. In this paper, we introduce multiple local search algorithms that can improve the total lifetime of WSNs consisting of nodes with varying initial energy. We discuss the performance of the existing dominating set algorithm and introduce three more algorithms which can be applied on multiple disjoint dominating sets with nodes having varying initial energy. We discuss the efficiency of each of the algorithms through extensive simulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it