Requirements Engineering in the Context of Big Data Applications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Requirements Engineering (RE) plays an essential role in the software engineering process, being considered as one of the most critical phases of the software development life-cycle. As we might expect, then, the Requirements Engineering would play a similar role in the context of Big Data applications. However, practicing Requirements Engineering is a challenging and complex task. It involves (i) stakeholders with diverse backgrounds and levels of knowledge, (ii) different application domains, (iii) it is expensive and error-prone, (iii) it is important to be aligned with business goals, to name a few. Because it involves such complex activities, a lot has to be understood in order to properly address Requirements Engineering. Especially, when the technology domain (e.g., Big Data) is not yet well explored. In this context, this paper describes a research plan on Requirements Engineering involving the development of Big Data applications. The high-level goal is to investigate: (i) On the technical front, the Requirements Engineering activities with respect to the analysis and specification of Big Data requirements and, (ii) on the management side, the relationship between RE and Business Goals in the development of Big Data Software applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.036 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it