MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2795289343 · doi:10.2118/190196-ms

Modeling of CoSolvent Assisted Chemical Flooding for Enhanced Oil Recovery in Heavy Oil Reservoirs

2018· article· en· W2795289343 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company
KeywordsMicroemulsionPetroleum engineeringEnhanced oil recoveryProcess engineeringSolubilityPulmonary surfactantSurface tensionProcess (computing)Steam injectionChemistryViscosityEnvironmental scienceChemical engineeringMaterials scienceThermodynamicsComputer scienceOrganic chemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Many attempts have been made to understand, design, and optimize a chemical flooding process; however, the current low oil price environment makes its implementation very challenging from an economics point of view. Recently, CoSolvent Assisted Chemical Flooding (CACF) has been considered as a promising approach to reduce the cost of surfactant-based recovery methods, especially in heavy oil reservoirs. More importantly, recent studies indicated that CACF can be efficiently applied at relatively low temperature, i.e., without the need of steam injection. This helps reduce for the cost of steam generation and injection, and the associated greenhouse gas effects. This paper presents a new development in modeling CACF using an Equation-of-State (EOS) compositional reservoir simulator. We used a new approach to model the behavior of the oil-water-microemulsion system based on solubility data without modeling type III microemulsion explicitly. The results showed an excellent agreement with numerous chemical coreflooding data and are in agreement with a chemical floodingresearch simulator. The new development presented includes the effects of cosolvent on rheological properties and phase behavior of microemulsion in the CACF process, particularly microemulsion viscosity and interfacial tension. The proposed model showed good agreement with four published CACF coreflood experiments in which surfactant was not used in alkali and polymer chemical slugs. This model efficiently captures the complex chemical reactionsoccurring in the CACF process, i.e., generation of in-situ soap based on reactions between alkali and a rich acid component in heavy crude oil. The model provides consistent results with laboratory coreflood data at different operating temperatures, which is very important for heavy oil reservoirs. The ultimate recovery factor by CACF coreflooding is about 97%, similar to ASP (Alkali, Surfactant and Polymer) coreflooding, but without the need of surfactant injection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.309
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it