Learning Tensors From Partial Binary Measurements
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We generalize the 1-bit matrix completion problem to higher order tensors. Consider a rank-r order-d tensor T in ℝN× ⋯ × ℝNwith bounded entries. We show that when r = O(1), such a tensor can be estimated efficiently from only m = Or(Nd) binary measurements. This shows that the sample complexity of recovering a low-rank tensor from 1-bit measurements of a subset of its entries is roughly the same as recovering it from unquantized measurements - a result that had been known only in the matrix case, i.e., when d = 2. By using a certain atomic M-norm as a convex proxy for rank, we allow for approximately low-rank tensors and give error bounds based on the M-norm of the tensor. We prove that the theoretical bounds are optimal both in the M-norm bound and the size N. Moreover, we show the advantage of directly using the low-rank tensor structure, rather than matricization, both theoretically and numerically. Specifically, we show how the 1-bit measurement model can be used for context-aware recommender systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".