MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2796572297 · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/suy005

Improving worldwide access to inexpensive and effective treatments for common cardiovascular diseases

2018· article· en· W2796572297 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal Supplements · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsHamilton Health SciencesMcMaster UniversityPopulation Health Research Institute
FundersCanada Research ChairsHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsMedicineContext (archaeology)Intensive care medicineKey (lock)Risk analysis (engineering)Health servicesEnvironmental healthComputer securityPopulationComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This essay focuses on a few themes that are usually not discussed in the context of prevention of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). While risk factors for CVD are important, in order to modify them effectively and reduce CVD, efficient health systems are needed. To be effective, health systems need to improve access to essential CVD medications and services for prevention and treatment. They should have an adequate number and mix of key health workers and through appropriate funding and organization overcome gaps in access to essential health services and medical products. Improved health systems are key to improving health through better prevention and treatment–both of which can have a major impact in reducing CVD and mortality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.250
GPT teacher head0.447
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it