MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799149976 · doi:10.1109/icsess.2017.8342971

Short-term traffic flow prediction based on wavelet function and extreme learning machine

2017· article· en· W2799149976 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning and ELM
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtreme learning machineTerm (time)Traffic flow (computer networking)Artificial neural networkComputer scienceWaveletGeneralizationArtificial intelligenceFunction (biology)Volume (thermodynamics)AlgorithmMachine learningMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the traffic flow has the characteristics of non-linear and strong interference, it has different features in different time-frequency domain. The traditional short-term traffic flow forecasting methods have the disadvantages of lower prediction accuracy, harder parameter determination and poorer adaptability. Aiming at above problems, we proposed a short - term traffic flow forecasting algorithm based on the wavelet function and the Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) to optimize the short - term traffic flow forecasting method. Firstly, the activation function of hidden layer neurons in the prediction model of the ELM is optimized according to the denoising principle of the wavelet function. Secondly, the short-term traffic volume prediction model of the ELM is established, and the traffic volume during the evening peak hours of the Canadian Whitemud Drive highway is forecasted. Finally, the results of this paper are compared with ones that predicted by BP neural network model Compared the R <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> value of 0.7 in this method with the one of 0.5331 in BP neural network, the results show that the proposed method in this paper has better generalization ability and more proper stability than BP neural network has. The prediction results are in good agreement with the desired short - term traffic volume, and the short-term traffic flow can be predicted more efficiently.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score0.676

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Learning and ELMFrench-language works237,207