Low-Power Approximate Multipliers Using Encoded Partial Products and Approximate Compressors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Approximate computing has been considered to improve the accuracy-performance tradeoff in error-tolerant applications. For many of these applications, multiplication is a key arithmetic operation. Given that approximate compressors are a key element in the design of power-efficient approximate multipliers, we first propose an initial approximate 4:2 compressor that introduces a rather large error to the output. However, the number of faulty rows in the compressor's truth table is significantly reduced by encoding its inputs using generate and propagate signals. Based on this improved compressor, two 4 × 4 multipliers are designed with different accuracies and then are used as building blocks for scaling up to 16 × 16 and 32×32 multipliers. According to the mean relative error distance (MRED), the most accurate of the proposed 16 × 16 unsigned designs has a 44% smaller power-delay product (PDP) compared to other designs with comparable accuracy. The radix-4 signed Booth multiplier constructed using the proposed compressor achieves a 52% reduction in the PDP-MRED product compared to other approximate Booth multipliers with comparable accuracy. The proposed multipliers outperform other approximate designs in image sharpening and joint photographic experts group applications by achieving higher quality outputs with lower power consumptions. For the first time, we show the applicability and practicality of approximate multipliers in multiple-input multiple-output antenna communication systems with error control coding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".