MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799419049 · doi:10.24295/cpsstpea.2018.00003

Power System Support Functions Provided by Smart Inverters—A Review

2018· article· en· W2799419049 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCPSS Transactions on Power Electronics and Applications · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenewable energyDistributed generationElectric power systemComputer scienceReliability engineeringSmart gridFlexibility (engineering)GridInterconnectionReliability (semiconductor)EngineeringElectrical engineeringPower (physics)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Renewable energy is seen as a viable alternative to traditional energy sources, and distributed generation (DG) based on renewable energy sources has experienced rapid growth worldwide. High penetration of renewable energy based DG systems makes the grid more vulnerable, and stricter standards have been issued for grid interconnection of DG systems. DG systems are expected to be controllable with high flexibility and reliability. Provision of grid support functions and ancillary services, such as reactive power control, fault ride-through and harmonic compensation, is the key to attaining higher utilization of DG. Such functionalities are implemented in new generation smart inverters, which can contribute to the reduced cost of energy and need for additional system resources. The state-of-the-art power system support functions are summarized in this paper for the purpose of enhancing operation in low-voltage networks. Experimental results are given to better understand the implementation of the functions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.832

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it