MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799419049 · doi:10.24295/cpsstpea.2018.00003

Power System Support Functions Provided by Smart Inverters—A Review

2018· article· en· W2799419049 on OpenAlexaff
Xin Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueCPSS Transactions on Power Electronics and Applications · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenewable energyDistributed generationElectric power systemComputer scienceReliability engineeringSmart gridFlexibility (engineering)GridInterconnectionReliability (semiconductor)EngineeringElectrical engineeringPower (physics)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Renewable energy is seen as a viable alternative to traditional energy sources, and distributed generation (DG) based on renewable energy sources has experienced rapid growth worldwide. High penetration of renewable energy based DG systems makes the grid more vulnerable, and stricter standards have been issued for grid interconnection of DG systems. DG systems are expected to be controllable with high flexibility and reliability. Provision of grid support functions and ancillary services, such as reactive power control, fault ride-through and harmonic compensation, is the key to attaining higher utilization of DG. Such functionalities are implemented in new generation smart inverters, which can contribute to the reduced cost of energy and need for additional system resources. The state-of-the-art power system support functions are summarized in this paper for the purpose of enhancing operation in low-voltage networks. Experimental results are given to better understand the implementation of the functions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations72
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCPSS Transactions on Power Electronics and ApplicationsSame topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207