MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2800203029 · doi:10.1080/13621025.2018.1462503

Memory and citizenship in diaspora: remembering the Armenian Genocide in Canada

2018· article· en· W2800203029 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCitizenship Studies · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMemory, Trauma, and Commemoration
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArmenianGenocideCitizenshipNarrativeCollective memoryDiasporaGender studiesThe HolocaustSociologyForgettingPolitics of memoryNexus (standard)Political scienceHistoryLawLiteratureArtLinguisticsAncient history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article explores how two public commemorations, the ‘March for Unity’ in Toronto and the ‘Thank you Canada!’ rally in Ottawa, have remembered the Armenian Genocide. Drawing on a qualitative analysis of field notes, speeches, and symbols, it argues that these mnemonic events illustrate the transnationalization of the Armenian Genocide around the overarching theme ‘I Remember and Demand.’ At the same time, these mnemonic events reveal the ways in which transnational memories of the Armenian Genocide are rearticulated in Canada through the prevailing narratives of memory and citizenship. Overall, these commemorations demonstrate that memory is central not only to the construction of Armenian ethnic identity within the constituents of ‘the Armenian Centennial Committee of Canada,’ the organizer of both events, but also to these groups’ and actors’ interpretations and practices of citizenship such as claims-making and public visibility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.738
Threshold uncertainty score0.814

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it