Neural Network Modeling for Family Welfare Classification
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Welfare in general can be defined as the level of a person's ability to meet their basic needs in the form of clothing, food, boards, education, and health. Welfare can be assessed in terms of family welfare. This study aims to perform analysis of artificial neural network modeling backpropagation method. The model will compare the optimization algorithm of artificial neural network results.
 The data used are 251 data of pre prosperous family in Banguntapan District, Bantul Regency. There are 16 input variables with 14 variables from BPS and 2 additional variables. There is one variable that has constant data so that this variable is not used in artificial neural network model analysis. There is a hidden layer with a number of dynamic neurons. Output layer there are 4 neurons which is the family welfare category. Data is processed using Matlab and SPSS. The system results show that the best accuracy for training is 68% of the Scale Conjugate Gradient algorithm while for best test results it is 68.8% of the Gradient Descent algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it