Scaling Human-Object Interaction Recognition Through Zero-Shot Learning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recognizing human object interactions (HOI) is an important part of distinguishing the rich variety of human action in the visual world. While recent progress has been made in improving HOI recognition in the fully supervised setting, the space of possible human-object interactions is large and it is impractical to obtain labeled training data for all interactions of interest. In this work, we tackle the challenge of scaling HOI recognition to the long tail of categories through a zero-shot learning approach. We introduce a factorized model for HOI detection that disentangles reasoning on verbs and objects, and at test-time can therefore produce detections for novel verb-object pairs. We present experiments on the recently introduced large-scale HICODET dataset, and show that our model is able to both perform comparably to state-of-the-art in fully-supervised HOI detection, while simultaneously achieving effective zeroshot detection of new HOI categories.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it