Immediate effect of a tear enhancer and meibomian gland expression on the corneal surface and whole eye higher order aberrations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To investigate changes in higher order ocular aberrations (HOA) induced by the administration of 0.15% sodium hyaluronate tear enhancer (TE) and meibomian gland expression (ME) on the tear film of normal subjects. HOA values were obtained from the corneal surface (CS) and whole eye (WE), using a corneal topographer and Shack–Hartmann aberrometer, from both eyes of 50 subjects (25 females, mean age ± sd 32.5 ± 11.0 years, and 25 males, 33.88 ± 11.2 years) for two pupil sizes (3 and 6 mm) in a dark environment. One drop of Blink Contacts™ (Abbott Medical Optics) was instilled into the right eye and HOA measurements repeated after 30 s. After 1 h, the meibomian glands of the left lower eyelid were gently squeezed and HOA measurements repeated after 30 s. There was no significant difference for CS and WE root mean square (RMS) HOAs between right and left eyes before (both pupil sizes) and after TE use or ME (3 mm pupil). For 6 mm pupil, TE use significantly reduced the WE RMS HOA (p < 0.05, mean ± sd) for Z40 (0.297 ± 0.136 to 0.053 ± 0.069), and Z55 (0.221 ± 0.372 to 0.098 ± 0.121) while ME significantly increased CS RMS HOA (p < 0.05, mean ± sd) for Z3−3 (0.799 ± 1.178 to 1.302 ± 1.991) and Z44 (0.594 ± 1.184 to 0.988 ± 1.463). In general, the change in HOA was significantly correlated with the initial value before TE use or ME (p < 0.05). There were no detectable differences between right and left eyes. For the 6 mm pupil, the tear enhancer tended to improve optical performance of the WE and meibomian gland expression tended to reduce the optical performance at the CS. Estudiar los cambios de las aberraciones oculares de alto orden (HOA) inducidas por la aplicación de las lágrimas artificiales con 0,15% de hialuronato sódico y la expresión de las glándulas de Meibomio (ME) en la película lagrimal en sujetos normales. Se obtuvieron los valores de HOA de la superficie corneal (SC) y de la totalidad del ojo, utilizando un topógrafo corneal y un aberrómetro Shack-Hartmann, de ambos ojos de 50 sujetos (25 mujeres, edad media ± DE 32,5 ± 11 años, y 25 varones, 33,88 ± 11,2 años) para dos tamaños de pupila (3 y 6 mm) en un entorno oscuro. Se instiló una gota de Blink Contacts™ (Abbott Medical Optics) en el ojo derecho, repitiéndose las mediciones de HOA transcurridos 30 segundos. Al cabo de 1 hora, se presionaron suavemente las glándulas de Meibomio del párpado inferior del ojo izquierdo y se repitieron las mediciones de HOA al cabo de 30 segundos. No se produjo diferencia significativa en el error cuadrático médio (RMS) de HOA de la superficie corneal y la totalidad del ojo entre los ojos derecho e izquierdo (ambos tamaños de pupila) antes o después del uso de las lágrimas artificiales o ME (pupila de 3 mm). Para pupilas de 6 mm, el uso de lágrimas artificiales redujo significativamente el RMS de HOA de la totalidad del ojo (p< 0,05, media ± DE) para Z04 (de 0,297 ± 0,136 a 0,053 ± 0,069), y Z55 (de 0,221 ± 0,372 a 0,098 ± 0,121) mientras que ME incrementó significativamente el RMS de HOA (p < 0,05, media ± DE) para Z−33 (de 0,799 ± 1,178 a 1,302 ± 1,991) y Z44 (de 0,594 ± 1,184 a 0,988 ± 1,463). En general, el cambio de HOA guardó una correlación significativa con el valor inicial antes del uso de lágrimas artificiales o ME (p < 0,05). No se observaron diferencias detectables entre los ojos derecho e izquierdo. Para la pupila de 6 mm, la lágrima artificial tendió a mejorar el rendimiento óptico de la totalidad del ojo, y la expresión de las glándulas de Meibomio tendió a reducir el rendimiento óptico de la superficie corneal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".