Dietary adherence and food acceptability among individuals with type 2 diabetes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This cross-sectional study of 80 type 2 diabetes patients examined adherence to and food acceptability of current Canadian diet recommendations and their association with hemoglobin A1c using uni- and multivariate analysis. Socio-demographic, perceived dietary adherence and food acceptability information was collected using questionnaires and a 3-day food record to measure actual adherence. Average intakes of saturated fat and sodium were above the recommendations. Diet acceptability in terms of choosing to buy and cook, and enjoyment of eating recommended foods was generally good. However after diagnosis of diabetes decreased enjoyment in dining away from home, lower consumption of ethnic foods and changes in frequency of eating certain foods were reported. Dietary adherence and better food acceptability was associated with lower A1c levels. Focusing on reducing sugar, fat and sodium intakes and incorporating culturally appropriate foods would help to improve adherence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it