Fast distribution network reconfiguration with graph theory
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Owing to mixed‐integer and non‐linear properties, the distribution network reconfiguration (DNRC) problem has been widely addressed with meta‐heuristic algorithms. To accelerate the solution process, two essential components of meta‐heuristic algorithms are investigated in this study: solution representation and fitness evaluation. Instead of the popular binary and integer numbers, decimal encoding is employed. Decoding is based on the proposed probability‐based loop destruction strategy. The fitness evaluation is based on the power flow calculation of radial network. Different from backward/forward sweep method, the advantageous direct solution technique is utilised, where the matrix generation process has been accelerated. Both improvements are based on the graph theory and fully explained with illustrative examples. Case studies are implemented on five benchmark systems. The superiority of the proposed methods over their advanced counterparts has been established with intensive comparisons. Finally, these methods are integrated into a standard particle swarm optimisation framework for the solution of DNRC. Results indicate that the proposals significantly improve the solution efficiency without the loss of quality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it