MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2802412176 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2018.8461435

Particle Flow Particle Filter for Gaussian Mixture Noise Models

2018· article· en· W2802412176 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticle filterNoise (video)Computer scienceParticle (ecology)Dimension (graph theory)Auxiliary particle filterFlow (mathematics)State spaceGaussian noiseNonlinear systemNoise measurementGaussianAlgorithmFilter (signal processing)Mathematical optimizationMathematicsNoise reductionKalman filterArtificial intelligenceEnsemble Kalman filterPhysicsMechanicsExtended Kalman filterStatisticsComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Particle filters has become a standard tool for state estimation in nonlinear systems. However, their performance usually deteriorates if the dimension of state space is high or the measurements are highly informative. A major challenge is to construct a proposal density that is well matched to the posterior distribution. Particle flow methods are a promising option for addressing this task. In this paper, we develop a particle flow particle filter algorithm to address the case where both the process noise and the measurement noise are distributed as mixtures of Gaussians. Numerical experiments are performed to explore when the proposed method offers advantages compared to existing techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.931
Threshold uncertainty score0.444

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it