MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2802493366 · doi:10.1145/3173047

Approximation Algorithms for Minimum-Load <i>k</i> -Facility Location

2018· article· en· W2802493366 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Algorithms · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFacility Location and Emergency Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsFacility location problemApproximation algorithmCombinatoricsLine (geometry)Integer (computer science)MathematicsSet (abstract data type)Steiner tree problemTree (set theory)Cover (algebra)Real lineMetric (unit)AlgorithmComputer scienceDiscrete mathematicsMathematical optimizationGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider a facility-location problem that abstracts settings where the cost of serving the clients assigned to a facility is incurred by the facility. Formally, we consider the minimum-load k-facility location (ML k FL) problem, which is defined as follows. We have a set F of facilities, a set C of clients, and an integer k ≥ 0. Assigning client j to a facility f incurs a connection cost d ( f , j ). The goal is to open a set F ⊆ F of k facilities and assign each client j to a facility f ( j )∈ F so as to minimize max f ∈ F ∑ j ∈ C : f ( j )= f d ( f , j ); we call ∑ j ∈ C : f ( j )= f d ( f , j ) the load of facility f . This problem was studied under the name of min-max star cover in References [3, 7], who (among other results) gave bicriteria approximation algorithms for ML k FL for when F = C . ML k FL is rather poorly understood, and only an O ( k )-approximation is currently known for ML k FL, even for line metrics . Our main result is the first polytime approximation scheme (PTAS) for ML k FL on line metrics (note that no non-trivial true approximation of any kind was known for this metric). Complementing this, we prove that ML k FL is strongly NP -hard on line metrics. We also devise a quasi-PTAS for ML k FL on tree metrics. ML k FL turns out to be surprisingly challenging even on line metrics and resilient to attack by a variety of techniques that have been successfully applied to facility-location problems. For instance, we show that (a) even a configuration-style LP-relaxation has a bad integrality gap and (b) a multi-swap k -median style local-search heuristic has a bad locality gap. Thus, we need to devise various novel techniques to attack ML k FL. Our PTAS for line metrics consists of two main ingredients. First, we prove that there always exists a near-optimal solution possessing some nice structural properties. A novel aspect of this proof is that we first move to a mixed-integer LP (MILP) encoding of the problem and argue that a MILP-solution minimizing a certain potential function possesses the desired structure and then use a rounding algorithm for the generalized-assignment problem to “transfer” this structure to the rounded integer solution. Complementing this, we show that these structural properties enable one to find such a structured solution via dynamic programming.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it