Approximation Algorithms for Minimum-Load <i>k</i> -Facility Location
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We consider a facility-location problem that abstracts settings where the cost of serving the clients assigned to a facility is incurred by the facility. Formally, we consider the minimum-load k-facility location (ML k FL) problem, which is defined as follows. We have a set F of facilities, a set C of clients, and an integer k ≥ 0. Assigning client j to a facility f incurs a connection cost d ( f , j ). The goal is to open a set F ⊆ F of k facilities and assign each client j to a facility f ( j )∈ F so as to minimize max f ∈ F ∑ j ∈ C : f ( j )= f d ( f , j ); we call ∑ j ∈ C : f ( j )= f d ( f , j ) the load of facility f . This problem was studied under the name of min-max star cover in References [3, 7], who (among other results) gave bicriteria approximation algorithms for ML k FL for when F = C . ML k FL is rather poorly understood, and only an O ( k )-approximation is currently known for ML k FL, even for line metrics . Our main result is the first polytime approximation scheme (PTAS) for ML k FL on line metrics (note that no non-trivial true approximation of any kind was known for this metric). Complementing this, we prove that ML k FL is strongly NP -hard on line metrics. We also devise a quasi-PTAS for ML k FL on tree metrics. ML k FL turns out to be surprisingly challenging even on line metrics and resilient to attack by a variety of techniques that have been successfully applied to facility-location problems. For instance, we show that (a) even a configuration-style LP-relaxation has a bad integrality gap and (b) a multi-swap k -median style local-search heuristic has a bad locality gap. Thus, we need to devise various novel techniques to attack ML k FL. Our PTAS for line metrics consists of two main ingredients. First, we prove that there always exists a near-optimal solution possessing some nice structural properties. A novel aspect of this proof is that we first move to a mixed-integer LP (MILP) encoding of the problem and argue that a MILP-solution minimizing a certain potential function possesses the desired structure and then use a rounding algorithm for the generalized-assignment problem to “transfer” this structure to the rounded integer solution. Complementing this, we show that these structural properties enable one to find such a structured solution via dynamic programming.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".