MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2802826315 · doi:10.1109/jestpe.2018.2831695

Modulation Schemes for Medium-Voltage PWM Current Source Converter-Based Drives: An Overview

2018· article· en· W2802826315 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsRockwell Automation (Canada)Toronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModulation (music)Pulse-width modulationHarmonicsVoltageElectronic engineeringPower (physics)Computer scienceVoltage sourceElectrical engineeringCurrent sourceEngineeringPhysicsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pulsewidth modulation current source converter (CSC)-based drive is one of the widely used drives in high-power (megawatt level) medium-voltage (MV) (2.3-6.6 kV) applications. The switching frequency of the MV CSC is limited to around 500 Hz to satisfy thermal requirement and reduce switching loss. Under such a condition, the overall performance of the used modulation scheme, especially its harmonics performance, is an important consideration for CSC-based drives. To date, a couple of modulation schemes have been proposed for MV CSCs, and this paper aims to present an overview of these modulation schemes. Traditional modulation schemes are reviewed, the recent advances are illustrated and analyzed, and the challenges and trends are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.926
Threshold uncertainty score0.785

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it