MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2802984807 · doi:10.1093/af/vfy002

Challenges of a one-health approach to the development of alternatives to antibiotics

2018· article· en· W2802984807 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnimal Frontiers · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicProbiotics and Fermented Foods
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
KeywordsAntibioticsAntibiotic resistanceLivestockInfectious disease (medical specialty)BiotechnologyAntimicrobialHuman healthDiseaseMedicineIntensive care medicineBiologyEnvironmental healthMicrobiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By 2050, global infectious disease caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria is projected to be responsible for 10 million human deaths per year—1.8 million more than cancer. Antibiotic resistance is a natural phenomenon, but the anthropomorphic use of antimicrobials has created heightened selective pressure that has led to an increased presence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in agriculture, aquaculture, and hospital environments. Concerns over the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria that threaten human health has prompted the retail and fast food sector to promote meat and milk produced from livestock that are raised “without the use of antibiotics.” Antibiotics have become an integral component of intensive livestock production and are used to treat (therapeutic use) and prevent (prophylactic, metaphylactic) infectious disease and promote growth (subtherapeutic). The growing restriction of antibiotic use in livestock production has promoted research into a plethora of potential alternatives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.847
Threshold uncertainty score0.111

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it