MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2803941974 · doi:10.31482/mmsl.2011.003

ONTOLOGICAL MODELS AND EXPERT SYSTEMS IN DECISION SUPPORT OF EMERGENCY SITUATIONS

2011· article· en· W2803941974 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMilitary Medical Science Letters · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Data Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecision support systemComputer scienceManagement scienceExpert systemKnowledge managementArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During emergency response operations many decisions have to be made. Information technologies provide possibilities for new tools to support decision makers in decisions that comprise of many critical factors and that require specialized knowledge. In these tools the complexity is tackled using modelling and simulations of possible scenarios of response operations. Today, conceptual modelling in the field of information technology is oriented on the ontological approach. Ontology is a shared vocabulary and an unambiguous machine processed specification of terms together with their relationships. The ontology can have the form of a taxonomy or classification, database schema or axiomatic theory. The ontological modelling can be utilized along with expert systems for decision support. Expert systems, in contrast to other approaches such as neural networks for instance, better reflect the domain knowledge and provide justification for the decision. The aim of this paper is to describe prerequisites and design general schema for decision support in response operations during biological incidents including the applicable technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score0.267

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it