Hyperspectral Image Classification With Stacking Spectral Patches and Convolutional Neural Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jointly combining the spatial and spectral features has proved to dramatically improve the performance of classifying hyperspectral image. Recently, utilizing neural networks to automatically model the spatial-spectral feature representations for hyperspectral images has become of great interest. This paper proposes a simple but innovative framework to classify hyperspectral image with two shallow convolutional neural networks (CNNs). First,principal component analysis whiteningis applied to decorrelate hundreds of spectral bands. Instead of selecting the principal components to reduce the spectral dimensionality, we retain all the spectral bands but compress the image cuboid into a one-channel spectral quilt bystacking spectral patches. In this way, not only all the spectral information is retained but also the computational complexity of training a neural network is reduced compared with conventional networks that directly input the spectral volumes. Moreover, the spectral quilt will contain some novel textural patterns that are effective at distinguishing classes. Two shallow CNNs are then applied to classify the spectral quilts. As shown in the experiments, both networks can outperform the standard analysis methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".