MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2805452940 · doi:10.1109/plans.2018.8373373

Utilizing the ACC-FMCW radar for land vehicles navigation

2018· article· en· W2805452940 on OpenAlexaff
Ashraf Abosekeen, Aboelmagd Noureldin, Michael J. Korenberg

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInertial Sensor and Navigation
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOdometerGlobal Positioning SystemInertial navigation systemInertial measurement unitComputer scienceRadarNavigation systemRemote sensingReal-time computingTelecommunicationsGeographyInertial frame of referenceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) such as Global Positioning System (GPS) are the prime land and autonomous vehicles navigation information source. However, urban canyons high rise buildings block the GPS signal. Therefore, the Inertial Navigation System (INS) or the Reduced Inertial Sensor System (RISS) are utilized as an alternative source of the navigation information. The RISS is able to produce a full navigation solution using less number of sensors and calculations. Dramatically, the RISS solution drifts over time as the INS system. The integration between the GPS and the RISS is mitigating each system drawbacks. However, during the GPS outage periods, the navigation system is only depending on the inertial measurements. The RISS is utilizing the odometer/speedometer to measure the vehicle's forward speed. Many types of error affect the odometer measurements. These errors are either due to the vehicle's specifications as the differences in wheel diameters, and/or inefficient wheelbase or the road nature as wheel slips, uneven road surfaces, and/or skidding. In this paper, a Radar-based RISS system is introduced to take place the traditional RISS or INS systems. The radar unit is an essential part of the adaptive cruise control (ACC) system. Furthermore, it is capable of measuring the relative velocity and distance between the carrying and the in front vehicle to reduce collisions and increase the safety of driving. In addition, the radar measurements are not affected by the error sources that affect the odometer. The idea is to invest the ground reflection and derive the forward speed of the onboard vehicle as the ACC keep a safe distance between the cars. A novel method based on extracting the ground reflection features is introduced to obtain the onboard vehicle's speed. The obtained speed is utilized with two accelerometers and one vertical gyroscope to produce the Radar-based RISS system. The proposed system has been integrated with the GPS producing a Radar-based RISS/GPS integrated navigation system. The system has been tested on a real road trajectory in a downtown area and involved several GPS signal outages. The results show the significant capabilities of the proposed system in keeping the navigation solution drift to a minimum especially when the GPS signal is in outage compared with the traditional RISS/GPS system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInertial Sensor and NavigationFrench-language works237,207