MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2806254187 · doi:10.1017/fms.2019.25

THE CHERN–SCHWARTZ–MACPHERSON CLASS OF AN EMBEDDABLE SCHEME

2019· article· en· W2806254187 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Paolo Aluffi

Bibliographic record

VenueForum of Mathematics Sigma · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsHypersurfaceMathematicsChern classCharacteristic classPure mathematicsComplete intersectionClass (philosophy)Variety (cybernetics)Jacobian matrix and determinantInvertible matrixScheme (mathematics)Projective varietyVector bundleMathematical analysisComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceCohomology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Chern–Schwartz–MacPherson class of a hypersurface in a nonsingular variety may be computed directly from the Segre class of the Jacobian subscheme of the hypersurface; this has been known for a number of years. We generalize this fact to arbitrary embeddable schemes: for every subscheme $X$ of a nonsingular variety $V$ , we define an associated subscheme $\mathscr{Y}$ of a projective bundle $\mathscr{V}$ over $V$ and provide an explicit formula for the Chern–Schwartz–MacPherson class of $X$ in terms of the Segre class of $\mathscr{Y}$ in $\mathscr{V}$ . If $X$ is a local complete intersection, a version of the result yields a direct expression for the Milnor class of $X$ . For $V=\mathbb{P}^{n}$ , we also obtain expressions for the Chern–Schwartz–MacPherson class of $X$ in terms of the ‘Segre zeta function’ of $\mathscr{Y}$ .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueForum of Mathematics SigmaSame topicAlgebraic Geometry and Number TheoryFrench-language works237,207