Balancing Computation Speed and Quality: A Decentralized Motion Planning Method for Cooperative Lane Changes of Connected and Automated Vehicles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper focuses on the multi-vehicle motion planning (MVMP) problem for cooperative lane changes of connected and automated vehicles (CAVs). The predominant decentralized MVMP methods can hardly explore and utilize the cooperation capability of a multi-vehicle team, thus they usually lead to low-quality solutions. This paper proposes a two-stage MVMP framework to find high-quality online solutions. Concretely, at stage 1, the CAV platoon transfers from its original formation to a sufficiently sparse formation; at stage 2, all the CAVs simultaneously change lanes with collision avoidance implicitly ensured. The CAVs only involve longitudinal rather than lateral motions at stage 1, thus the collision-avoidance constraints can be easily handled. Since stage 2 begins with a sparse formation, the implicitly ensured collision avoidance can be completely omitted then. Through this, the proposed method avoids directly handling the challenging collision avoidance conditions, thereby being able to compute fast. As the vehicles run cooperatively and simultaneously at either stage, the obtained solutions are near-optimal. The completeness, effectiveness, and quality of the proposed two-stage MVMP method are validated through theoretical analysis and comparative simulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".