3D‐Printed Microfluidic Devices for Materials Science
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Microfluidics (MFs) has emerged as a valuable and in some cases, unique platform for the synthesis and assembly of inorganic and polymeric materials. 3D printing enables time‐, labor‐, and cost‐efficient prototyping of MF devices, their durability during operation, and the ability to implement complex designs, however the applications of 3D‐printed MF devices in materials science are still in their infancy. Here, the synthesis and assembly of a diverse range of materials, including spraying‐based synthesis of inorganic NPs and conductive filaments, extrusion‐based fabrication of hydrogel fibers and sheets, and the preparation of composite solid films are reported. The properties are examined and potential applications of these materials are shown, the advantages of material fabrication in 3D‐printed MF devices are highlighted, and the directions for their further development are identified.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it