MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2807570627 · doi:10.1109/jstars.2018.2838449

Evaluation of Unmixing Methods for Impervious Surface Area Extraction From Simulated EnMAP Imagery

2018· article· en· W2807570627 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRemote-Sensing Image Classification
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndmemberHyperspectral imagingNon-negative matrix factorizationComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Remote sensingArtificial intelligenceMatrix decompositionGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distribution of impervious surface area (ISA) is an important input in a wide range of urban ecosystem studies. The future launch of the German hyperspectral satellite environmental mapping and analysis program (EnMAP) in 2019 provides new opportunities for timely and global ISA extraction. The previously proposed EnMAP applications heavily relied on existing reference endmembers, which may be impractical on a global scale. To overcome this defect, we suggest to use the nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) method to extract the endmember directly from EnMAP imagery. Three traditional unmixing method (e.g., N-Findr, pixel purity index, and independent component analysis) and four NMF-based methods with different constraints (e.g., sparseness, convex volume, and nonlinearity) were used to obtain series of endmember sets, ISA fraction, and classification maps. In results, the NMF-based methods outperformed the three traditional unmixing method, by achieving 0.5-0.6 R-squared values in the linear regression models between predicted and reference ISA percentages, and over 85% overall accuracy in ISA classification maps. We found that the NMF-based spectral unmixing methods are suitable to work with the EnMAP image, when reference endmember data are unavailable. In addition, we processed the widely used Hydice urban test image with the same methods and compared the resulting ISA percentage/classification maps with the EnMAP results, considering the different features of the Hydice and EnMAP sensors. In the results, it is proved that the EnMAP image has great potential in ISA mapping on a global scale, with reasonable overall accuracy and economical efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.714
Threshold uncertainty score0.638

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it