Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
total failure, the author suggests that an unwillingness to acknowledge the disparate identities of its constituent groups has left the movement in crisis.Wolford argues that in this way the MST has engaged in a politics of identity which privileges 'scale' over 'place', benefiting struggles at the national and transnational level by presenting a unified identity whilst losing at the sub-national level by failing to account for difference (p.76).This study presents an important step beyond previous examinations of the MST in English, deploying a more nuanced theoretical framework for understanding the relationship between identity, land and politics in Brazil.However, Wolford's analysis could have been extended further through a deeper engagement with Antonio Gramsci's conceptualization of common sense, something which the author entertains but ultimately discards (p.22).For Gramsci, common sense is understood as a world view shaped by the priorities of the dominant class -a framing that views common sense as a barrier to be overcome (Gramsci 1971: 419 -20).The relationship between the movement and its members might be further clarified by analyzing the MST's efforts to overcome this barrier by developing the critical consciousness of rural workers.Whilst Wolford does progress beyond the view of the MST as a 'monolithic' identity, in effect her study simply supplants it with several further identities which are left unchallenged.A more fruitful direction for further enquiry might be an analysis of the educational program of the Landless Workers Movement which encourages rural workers to question the moral economies which the author describes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it