MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2807964422 · doi:10.1093/jvcult/vcy036

Data Visualization and Population Politics in Pearson’s Magazine, 1896–1902

2018· article· en· W2807964422 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Victorian Culture · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicData Analysis and Archiving
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiopowerPopulationNarrativeVisualizationPoliticsSociologyGeographyArtLiteraturePolitical scienceComputer scienceLawArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article investigates population journalism, a fin-de-siècle periodical genre that combined data visualization with narrative analysis of vital statistics about human populations. Through the visualization of population data, population journalism combined Victorian popular culture and population politics, or what Michel Foucault terms ‘biopolitics’. Following an overview of biopolitics, vital statistics, and data visualization in the long nineteenth century, the article focuses on population journalism in Pearson’s Magazine to examine how this genre combined the verbal rhetoric of statistical narrative with the visual, spatial, and material aesthetics of data visualization to represent the British nation as a managed population body. Pearson’s used two types of images for its population journalism: abstract data visualizations reproduced by line-block engraving and photorealistic data visualizations reproduced by halftone engraving. Through their respective aesthetics, the abstract and photorealistic population visualizations imbricated modern image reproduction technology and modern statistical methods, encouraging readers to conflate population politics with popular culture. While the abstract visualizations rationalized the individual body as an abstract population unit, the photorealistic visualizations remediated the individual body as a component of multimodal, mass print spectacle. This case study demonstrates that historical and contemporary population data visualization, as a set of practices for quantifying human life, enacts a biopolitics of normalization. My analysis also shows that fully understanding this politics requires attention to the roles played by the medium and aesthetic affordances of a particular data visualization, the media literacy of its users, and the ideological genealogy of the data visualization practices that produced it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.763
Threshold uncertainty score0.265

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it