MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2808118317 · doi:10.22214/ijraset.2018.4686

Design and Implementation of a Low Power Vedic Multiplier

2018· article· en· W2808118317 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEvolutionary Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiplier (economics)Computer scienceArithmeticMathematicsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes the design of a low power Vedic Multiplier using the technique of Vedic Mathematics that has been modified to reduce the power consumption.Vedic multiplier is based on a novel concept in which the partial products are generated using concurrent additions. In this paper an 8 bit Vedic multiplier is designed using four 4 bit Vedic multipliers and various adder circuits. The adder circuits are realized using mux based adders instead of conventional adders as in normal Vedic multipliers. The 8×8 Vedic Multiplier circuit is coded in verilog, synthesized and simulated using Cadence Software. The power consumption and area of the multiplier using MUX based adders are compared with existing ones. Results show that the power consumption is reduced by 41% when compared to conventional Vedic multipliers and the results appear to be promising. The combination of low power and lesser area makes the new multiplier a viable option for implementing low power designs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.743
Threshold uncertainty score0.179

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it