Mathematical model, heuristics and exact method for order picking in narrow aisles
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Order picking is one of the most challenging operations in distribution centre management and one of the most important sources of costs. One way to reduce the lead time and associated costs is to minimise the total amount of work for collecting all orders. This paper is motivated by a collaboration with an industrial partner who delivers furniture and electronic equipment. We have modelled their narrow aisles order picking problem as a vehicle routing problem through a series of distance transformations between all pairs of locations. Security issues arising when working on narrow aisles impose an extra layer of difficulty when determining the routes. We show that these security measures and the operator equipment allow us to decompose the problem per aisle. In other words, if one has to pick orders from three aisles in the warehouse, it is possible to decompose the problem and create three different instances of the picking problem. Our approach yields an exact representation of all possible picking sequences. We also show that neglecting 2D aspects and solving the problem over a 1D warehouse yields significant difference in the solutions, which are then suboptimal for the real 2D case. We have solved a large set of instances reproducing realistic configurations using a combination of heuristics and an exact algorithm, minimising the total distance travelled for picking all items. Through extensive computational experiments, we identify which of our methods are better suited for each aisle configuration. We also compare our solutions with those obtained by the company order picking procedures, showing that improvements can be achieved by using our approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it