MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2809040573 · doi:10.2118/191188-ms

Effect of Temperature, Phase Change, and Chemical Additive on Wettability Alteration During Steam Applications in Sands and Carbonates

2018· article· en· W2809040573 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Trinidad and Tobago Section Energy Resources Conference · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWettingContact angleMaterials scienceCarbonatePhase (matter)Saturation (graph theory)Petroleum engineeringMineralogyComposite materialChemistryGeologyMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract One of the unanswered issues with steam applications is the wettability state during the process. Removal of polar groups from the rock surface with increasing temperature improves water wettability; however, other factors, including phase change, play a reverse role on it. In other words, hot water or steam will show different wettability characteristics, eventually affecting the recovery. On the other hand, wettability can be altered using steam additives. The mechanism of these phenomena is not yet clear. The objective of this work is to quantitatively evaluate the steam-induced wettability alteration in different rock systems and analyze the mechanism of wettability change caused by the change of the phase of water and chemical additives. Heavy-oil from a field in Alberta (27,780 cP at 25°C) was used in contact angle measurements conducted on mica, calcite plates, and rock pieces obtained from a bitumen containing carbonate reservoir (Grosmont). All measurements were conducted at a temperature range up to 200°C using a high-temperature high-pressure IFT device. To obtain a comprehensive understanding of this process, different factors, including the phase of water, pressure, rock-type, and contact sequence were considered and studied separately. Initially, the contact angles between oil and water were measured at different pressures to study the effect of pressure on wettability by maintaining water in the liquid phase. Secondly, the contact angle was measured in pure steam by keeping pressure lower than the saturation pressure. The influence of contacting sequence was investigated by reversing the sequence of generating steam and introducing oil during measurement. These measurements were repeated on different substrates. Different temperature resistant chemicals (surfactants and alkalis) were added to steam during contact angle to test their wettability alteration characteristics at different temperature and pressure conditions (steam or hot-water phases). The results showed that wettability of tested substrates is not sensitive to pressure as long as the phase has not been changed. The system, however, was observed to be more oil-wet in steam than in water at the same temperature, for example, in the case of calcite. Analysis of the degree of the wettability alteration induced by steam (or hot-water) and temperature was helpful to further understand the interfacial properties of steam/bitumen/rock system and useful in the recovery performance estimation of steam injection process in carbonate and sand reservoirs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.240
Threshold uncertainty score0.559

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it