Introducing hinge mechanisms to one compressive-mode piezoelectric energy harvester
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, a hinge mechanism is introduced into one compressive-mode piezoelectric energy harvester to improve its performance. First, the concept of implementing hinge mechanisms is introduced on a high-efficiency compressive-mode piezoelectric energy harvester (HC-PEH). Second, a numerical model based on the piezoelectric constitutive equation and the Duffing oscillator equations is formulated to obtain voltage responses, velocity responses, and the fundamental frequency and bandwidth. Then, a prototype is fabricated to validate the results of the model. Depending on the number of hinges applied to the HC-PEH, three cases are investigated: fully hinged, partially hinged, and clamped. In both numerical modeling and experimental studies, the HC-PEH prototypes in the three cases are exposed to frequency-sweep excitations to illustrate the dynamic and transduction behaviors. The results demonstrate that the overall performance in the hinged cases is improved significantly compared to that in the clamped case. The output voltage and output power are increased by 2–3 times and up to 5 times, respectively, and fundamental resonant frequency is lowered to below 20 Hz. Furthermore, it is shown that the operational bandwidth is widened by up to 37%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it