MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2809633524 · doi:10.1002/hsr2.58

Lung clearance index is elevated in young children with symptom‐controlled asthma

2018· article· en· W2809633524 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth Science Reports · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryPublic Health OntarioUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick Children
FundersHospital for Sick Children
KeywordsMedicineAsthmaConfidence intervalPulmonary function testingPediatricsVentilation (architecture)AirwayLung functionInternal medicineLungAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Pulmonary function testing has been recommended as an adjunct to symptom monitoring for assessment of asthma control. Lung clearance index (LCI) measures ventilation inhomogeneity and is thought to represent changes in the small airways. It has been proposed as a useful early marker of airway disease in asthmatic subjects, and determining it is feasible in preschool children. This study aims to assess whether LCI remains elevated in symptomatically controlled asthmatic children with a history of severe asthma, compared with healthy controls. A secondary aim was to determine whether the results were consistent across the preschool and school‐aged populations. Methods Using a case‐control design, we compared 33 children with currently well‐controlled symptoms who had a history of severe asthma, to 45 healthy controls (age 3‐15 years) matched by age, height, and sex. We performed multiple breath washout tests using sulfur hexafluoride as a tracer gas, to determine their LCI and S cond values. Results In the overall study, LCI z‐score values were on average 0.86 units (95% confidence interval: 0.24‐1.47, P = 0.01, t‐test) higher in children with a history of severe asthma with current well‐controlled symptoms compared with healthy controls. In addition, within the subgroup of preschool children (age ≤ 6), the asthmatic had significantly higher LCI z‐score values than their healthy controls peers (mean (SD), 0.57 (2.18) vs −1.10 (1.00), P = 0.03, t‐test). Twenty‐seven percent (27%; 9/33) of subjects had an LCI value greater than the upper limit of our healthy controls despite being symptom controlled. Amongst preschool children, 5 (42%; 5/12) of the asthmatic children had abnormal LCI at the individual level. Conclusions LCI is elevated in children with asthma, which may be driven by differences in the preschool population. LCI may be useful in defining preschool asthma endotypes with persistent ventilation inhomogeneity despite symptomatic control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.537

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it