MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2809973593 · doi:10.23907/2013.047

Pathologic Findings in Fatal and Nonfatal Asthma

2013· article· en· W2809973593 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademic Forensic Pathology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsthmaMedicineBasement membranePathologyAirwayPopulationHyperplasiaRespiratory epitheliumImmunologyEpitheliumSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Asthma is a common disease in the population and fatal asthma cases are not rare. Patients with fatal asthma not infrequently die outside of hospitals and become forensic cases. The pathologic features of asthma are very variable, but fatal asthma is always characterized by extensive mucous plugs in the airways and lungs that tend to remain inflated when the chest is opened. Other microscopic features that may be seen in asthma include increased amounts of airway smooth muscle, marked thickening of airway basement membranes, goblet cell hyperplasia, and various patterns of airway inflammation including eosinophils, neutrophils, and lymphocytes. Absent a history, a presumptive diagnosis of fatal asthma can be made in a patient whose lungs are hyperinflated and demonstrate numerous mucous plugs in the large airways, and this is usually accompanied by a markedly thickened basement membrane in the large airways on microscopic examination, but the possibility that the fatal asthma attack was precipitated by exogeneous factors such as drugs, fumes, or irritants should be borne in mind.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.178
Threshold uncertainty score0.606

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it