MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2810614671 · doi:10.1109/tii.2018.2849984

A Secure Content Caching Scheme for Disaster Backup in Fog Computing Enabled Mobile Social Networks

2018· article· en· W2810614671 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceServerBackupComputer networkMobile edge computingCloud computingEdge computingEncryptionEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionReliability (semiconductor)Distributed computingOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Caching content with fog computing at the edge nodes has been a promising alternative to mitigate burdens of backbone networks and improve mobile users' quality of experience in mobile social networks (MSNs). However, as edge node may be vulnerable due to the attacks from malicious users, the design of secure caching schemes for the fog/edge enabled MSNs becomes a new challenge. In this paper, to tackle the above problem, we propose a secure caching scheme for disaster backup in MSNs with fog computing. Specifically, to protect the privacy, a partitioning and scrambling method is first designed to encrypt the contents. Then, the encrypted contents are replicated to multiple replicates, where these replicates are delivered and stored in different servers. Based on the recovery time objective and content delivery latency, an auction game model is developed to determine the optimal servers, where both edge nodes and cloud servers can obtain the maximum utilities. Extensive simulations are conducted to show the effectiveness and reliability of the proposed scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.808
Threshold uncertainty score0.890

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it