MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2810826711 · doi:10.29173/cf477

La déclinaison visuelle du monstre au XVIIIe siècle : Goya

2018· article· fr· W2810826711 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueConvergences francophones · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les Lumières cherchent à libérer le monstre des différentes cages où la tradition l’avait enfermé. L’imaginaire européen du monstrueux se fraie, au XVIIIe siècle, un chemin nouveau grâce aux écrivains et aux peintres les plus géniaux. Goya est, de tous les artistes des Lumières crépusculaires, celui qui a su récupérer le mieux l’univers classique du monstrueux pour, ensuite, exceller dans une éclatante déclinaison des figures de la tératologie moderne, allant des plus perceptibles aux moins visibles: l’animal et ses variantes les plus domestiques et les plus obscures, l’homme et ses âges, l’individu et ses états sociaux, toutes ces figures quotidiennes, familières, dévoilent dans la galerie goyesque une monstruosité d’autant plus inquiétante qu’elle est en nous. Et de là, par la figuration symbolique, le peintre et graveur défie l'inavouable, l’irreprésentable, pour donner forme de monstre aux hantises, aux peurs les plus terribles de l’âme humaine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.558
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.008
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.035

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it