MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2810984716 · doi:10.1111/sjos.12462

Maximum likelihood estimation for totally positive log‐concave densities

2020· preprint· en· W2810984716 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueScandinavian Journal of Statistics · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersOffice of Naval Research GlobalDivision of Mathematical SciencesAlfred P. Sloan Foundation
KeywordsMathematicsCombinatoricsMaximum likelihoodIndependent and identically distributed random variablesDimension (graph theory)Quasi-maximum likelihoodLikelihood functionEstimatorRestricted maximum likelihoodExponential familyFunction (biology)StatisticsConditional probability distributionConjectureMaximum likelihood sequence estimationRandom variable

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We study nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation for two classes of multivariate distributions that imply strong forms of positive dependence; namely log‐supermodular ( MTP 2 ) distributions and log ‐ L ♮ ‐ concave ( LLC ) distributions. In both cases we also assume log‐concavity in order to ensure boundedness of the likelihood function. Given n independent and identically distributed random vectors from one of our distributions, the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) exists a.s. and is unique a.e. with probability one when n ≥3. This holds independently of the ambient dimension d . We conjecture that the MLE is always the exponential of a tent function. We prove this result for samples in {0,1} d or in under MTP 2 , and for samples in under LLC. Finally, we provide a conditional gradient algorithm for computing the maximum likelihood estimate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it