MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2814294926 · doi:10.1109/noms.2018.8406293

Streaming Botnet traffic analysis using bio-inspired active learning

2018· article· en· W2814294926 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Stream Mining Techniques
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBotnetRobustness (evolution)Computer scienceGenetic programmingClass (philosophy)Artificial intelligenceTraffic analysisTraffic generation modelMachine learningComputer networkWorld Wide WebThe Internet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Non-stationary network traffic, together with stealth occurrences of malicious behaviors, make analyzing network traffic challenging. In this research, a machine learning framework is used to incrementally learn the network behavior and adapt to the changes in the traffic. This framework works under two main constraints: 1) label budget, 2) class imbalance; which makes it suitable for real-world network scenarios. Evaluations are performed on a public dataset with multiple Botnet scenarios under 0.5% and 5% label budgets; only around 2.2% of traffic is Botnet. Our results demonstrate the significance of the proposed Stream Genetic Programming solution and a general robustness to factors such as long latencies between instances of the same Botnet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.672

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicData Stream Mining TechniquesFrench-language works237,207