A method for UAV multi-sensor fusion 3D-localization under degraded or denied GPS situation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have been developed to be used in complex environments. Continuity of a UAV operation when GPS is degraded or denied is crucial in many applications, such as flying near high buildings and trees, or flying outdoor-to-indoor. In this paper, an algorithm for 3D-localization during transition between indoor and outdoor environments for a UAV is presented. Localization inputs are based on information from GPS, inertial measurement unit, monocular camera, and optical flow sensor. Information is carefully selected using GPS quality indicator method corresponding to the operating environment. After that, a smoothing offset approach is employed to smooth the position estimation. The selected sensors’ data are filtered by indirect extended Kalman filter for localization and extrinsic sensor calibration in real time. Results show a seamless offset convergence of UAV localization for indoor–outdoor transition. Moreover, the proposed method of decision-making to cut off GPS measurement even when it experiences poor signal quality can still outperform conventional GPS-based cutoff method in terms of response time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it