A Lifetime Reliability-Constrained Runtime Mapping for Throughput Optimization in Many-Core Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to technology scaling, lifetime reliability is becoming one of the major design constraints in the performance optimization of future many-core systems. Given a lifetime reliability constraint, the existing lifetime-constrained runtime mapping schemes often lead to low throughput because of the requirement to map all applications to compact regions. In this paper, we propose a runtime application mapping scheme that exploits a borrowing strategy to improve the throughput of many-core systems given a lifetime constraint. First, we propose using different strategies for mapping communication-intensive applications and computation-intensive applications. The lifetime reliability constraint can be relaxed in the local time scale when the communication requirement is high. The throughput is improved because the communication distance of communication-intensive applications is optimized while the waiting time of computation-intensive application is reduced. Then, we propose a method to effectively classify applications depending on the communication-to-computation ratio. A dynamic threshold is determined according to the current locations of available cores. Finally, we propose an improved neighborhood allocation scheme to reduce the communication cost in the task mapping. The experimental results show that compared to the state-of-the-art lifetime-constrained mapping, the proposed mapping scheme improves the throughput of many-core systems by 26% on average for synthetic task graphs and by 20% on average for realistic task graphs while the lifetime reliability is maintained within a constraint.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".