MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2858933238 · doi:10.30853/manuscript.2018-7.24

MILITARY PARADE IN THE RUSSIAN PAINTING OF THE SECOND QUARTER OF THE XIX CENTURY AS A SYMBOL OF GLORIFICATION OF THE EMPEROR NICHOLAS I: REPRESENTATION OF CLASSICISTIC IDEA IN THE CANVASES OF ROMANTIC ARTISTIC MOVEMENT (BY THE EXAMPLE OF A. I. LADURNER’S AND G. G. CHERNETSOV’S PAINTINGS)

2018· article· en· W2858933238 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ilga Yanovna Beiner

Bibliographic record

VenueManuscript · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParadeSymbol (formal)EmperorPaintingArtQuarter (Canadian coin)Style (visual arts)Visual artsArt historyIconographyRepresentation (politics)LiteratureAncient historyHistoryPoliticsPhilosophyArchaeologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article is devoted to identifying the peculiarities of depicting and interpreting military parade in the Russian easel painting of the second quarter of the XIX century. Military parade is considered as a symbol of glorification of the rule of the emperor Nicholas I. The author analyzes the techniques to develop artistic spaces designed in the romantic style but satisfying the classicistic tradition to perpetuate the monarch’s image. A. I. Ladurner’s and G. G. Chernetsov’s canvases depicting the erection of the monument to the autocrat Alexander I on the Palace Square in 1834 serve as the examples of pictorial narration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.007
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueManuscriptSame topicHistorical Art and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207