MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2883239360 · doi:10.1117/12.2314354

First on-sky results, performance, and future of the HiCIBaS-LOWFS

2018· article· en· W2883239360 on OpenAlexaffabout
Denis Brousseau, Guillaume Allain, Simon Thibault, Cédric Vallée, Mireille Ouellet, Jean‐Pierre Véran, Olivier Daigle

Bibliographic record

VenueAdaptive Optics Systems VI · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdaptive optics and wavefront sensing
Canadian institutionsHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWavefrontTelescopeAdaptive opticsOpticsWavefront sensorPhysicsPyramid (geometry)Cardinal pointCoronagraphSkyOptical telescopeComputer scienceExoplanetAstronomyPlanet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

HiCIBaS-LOWFS is a spatially modulated pyramid wavefront sensor to be used on the HiCIBaS project, a high-contrast imaging balloon borne telescope, as a fine pointing and atmospheric turbulence sensor. Since the project will be using a relatively small telescope on a limited budget, creative solutions must be developed to respond to the requirements for such systems. For example, we need a linear response to large error in order to be able to correct for pointing error in a photon-limited regime caused by the telescope small size. Most solutions aren't well suited for the optical design in HiCIBaS since the high-contrast coronagraph and the Low-Order Wavefront Sensor (LOWFS) both run as separate instruments. The design is centered around the modification of existing pyramid wavefront sensor by adding static, spatial modulation to an otherwise unmodulated system. The spatial modulation is achieved by adding an axicon (a conical optical element) at an imaged telescope pupil plane. This has for effect to add a very large non- common path aberration between the imaging plane and the wavefront sensor. This has for effect to shape the point-spread function incident on the pyramid to a ring shape, which minimize diffraction effect on the apex of imperfect pyramids. We present the first lab results involving the wavefront sensor and its performances for wavefront reconstruction and pointing accuracy. We also discuss the first on-sky results that were recorded with the 1.6-m telescope at the Observatoire du Mont-Megantic in Qubec, Canada using Universite Lavals optical AO test-bench. These results pave the way to the design and integration of the wavefront sensor in the context of the HiCIBaS project.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdaptive Optics Systems VISame topicAdaptive optics and wavefront sensingFrench-language works237,207