MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2884095962 · doi:10.9778/cmajo.20170158

Cost savings with transcutaneous screening versus total serum bilirubin measurement for newborn jaundice in hospital and community settings: a cost-minimization analysis

2018· article· en· W2884095962 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCMAJ Open · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Health and Biochemistry
Canadian institutionsSaskatchewan HealthUniversity of SaskatchewanSaskatchewan Health Authority
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJaundiceCost-minimization analysisMedicineBilirubinCommunity hospitalMinificationPediatricsCost analysisSerum bilirubinEmergency medicineIntensive care medicineMedical emergencyComputer scienceSurgeryInternal medicineReliability engineeringEngineeringNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background:</h3> Leading authorities in North America recommend universal screening via total serum bilirubin (TSB) measurement or transcutaneous bilirubinometry (TcB) for kernicterus prevention. We assessed costs associated with these 2 screening methods in hospital and in urban and rural community settings. <h3>Methods:</h3> Our tertiary care centre in Saskatoon, with about 5600 births per year, serves the local population of 300 000; in addition, 30% of patients are referred from outside the local community and surrounding area. We obtained health administrative data for two 6-month periods: before (June 1 to Nov. 30, 2015 [TSB program]) and after (June 1 to Nov. 30, 2016 [TcB–TSB program]) implementation of universal screening with TcB. Data on nurses’ time and mileage were collected to assess the mean time for screening and sample transportation. We performed a cost-minimization analysis. <h3>Results:</h3> The observed requirement for TSB blood draws decreased by 71.4% after implementation of TcB (1383.2/1000 live births to 397.8/1000 live births), whereas the overall number of screens increased from 1383.2 to 2758.6/1000 live births. The mean time per screen decreased from 12.52 (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.44–14.59) minutes with TSB to 2.94 (95% CI 2.55–3.33) minutes with TcB (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The estimated cost per TcB screen in hospital and community (urban and rural) settings was $3.54 and $3.76, respectively, and the estimated cost per TSB screen in hospital and in urban and rural community settings was $15.82, $50.21 and $65.03, respectively. The estimated overall 6-month savings with the TcB–TSB hospital and community programs were $19 760 and $6417, respectively. <h3>Interpretation:</h3> The TcB–TSB program reduced nurses’ time to screen and provided immediate results at the point of care. Transcutaneous bilirubinometry reduced the requirement for painful heel pokes while improving access to screening and decreasing the overall program cost.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.630
Threshold uncertainty score0.549

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it