MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2884379947 · doi:10.1109/dcc.2018.00058

Optimal Single- and Multiple-Tree Almost Instantaneous Variable-to-Fixed Codes

2018· article· en· W2884379947 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAlgorithms and Data Compression
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrefixProperty (philosophy)Variable (mathematics)Computer sciencePrefix codeTrieTree (set theory)Constraint (computer-aided design)AlgorithmTheoretical computer scienceMathematicsData structureBlock codeCombinatoricsLinear codeDecoding methodsProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Variable-to-fixed codes are often based on dictionaries that obey the prefix-free property. In particular, the Tunstall algorithm builds such codes. However, the prefix-free property is not necessary to have correct variable-to-fixed codes. Removing the constraint to obey the prefix-free property may offer the opportunity to build more efficient codes. Here, we come back on the almost instantaneous variable-to-fixed codes introduced by Yamamoto and Yokoo. They considered both single trees and multiple trees to perform the parsing of the source data. We show that, in some cases, their techniques build suboptimal codes. We propose potential correctives to their techniques. We also propose a new, completely different technique based on dynamic programming that builds optimal dictionary trees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.887
Threshold uncertainty score0.495

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAlgorithms and Data CompressionFrench-language works237,207